Happiness Is Not a Mood: What Thirteen Years of Reading the Research Has Changed in How I Understand Joy

A revisit of an old post on happiness — what I had right, what I had wrong, and what thirteen years of research has changed in how I understand joy.

In 2013, I wrote a blog post called Optimize Brain Function and Create Happiness. It was a list of twenty-five things — meditation, journaling, gratitude, exercise, kindness, supplements with specific dosages, positive thinking, eye contact, power posing, and so on. The post did well at the time. It captured what was current in the cultural conversation about happiness then. And reading it now, more than a decade later, I see that some of what I wrote has held up beautifully and some of it has not.

This post is a revisit. Not a replacement of the original — that one is still there if you want to look at it. A genuine rethinking of what I have come to understand about happiness in the years since I wrote it. The work I do as a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist has changed me. So has the field. Some things that seemed straightforward in 2013 are more complicated than I knew. Some things I did not yet understand have become central to how I think about wellbeing.

Here is what has changed.

What I had right

Small changes still matter. That was the heart of the 2013 post and it remains true. Daily practices, repeated over time, produce more change than dramatic interventions. The brain and the body respond to consistency more than to intensity. A short daily meditation done for months produces results that a long retreat experience does not match. A gratitude practice of three things, written down most evenings, accumulates into a different relationship with one’s life over a year.

The basics still matter. Movement, sleep, hydration, time in nature, reduced exposure to chronic stress, regular meals — these are not glamorous interventions. They are the conditions under which the nervous system can function. Without them, no amount of mindset work will reach the underlying physiology that determines so much of what we call happiness.

Other people matter. The 2013 version of the post emphasized surrounding yourself with positive people, and that observation has been deepened rather than overturned by subsequent research. The single most consistent finding in happiness science over the past two decades is that the quality of your close relationships predicts your well-being more reliably than almost any other factor. Not the number of relationships. Not their visible success. The felt quality of being loved, seen, and known by the people closest to you.

What I had wrong

I framed happiness as a choice, full stop. “Happiness is a choice,” the original post said. It is not entirely wrong, but it is not entirely right either. Happiness involves choices, certainly — daily practices, attention to what fills you, willingness to engage in relationships that nourish you. And it is also significantly shaped by genetic factors, by current life circumstances, by physiological conditions that no amount of choosing can override, by trauma history, and by the social and economic conditions in which a person is trying to live.

Telling someone who is depressed that happiness is a choice often produces shame rather than help. The choice framing works for people whose baseline state is already pretty stable and who can benefit from small adjustments. For people whose baseline state has been compromised by depression, anxiety, chronic stress, unprocessed trauma, or serious medical conditions, the choice framing can be actively harmful. It implies that their suffering is, in some way, their own fault. It is not.

I included specific supplement dosages. I would not do that today. Blog posts are not the right place for supplement recommendations, both because the research has shifted on most of what I listed and because the legal and ethical standards around supplement advice have tightened appropriately. Anyone considering supplements should talk to their doctor or to a licensed nutritionist who can assess them as individuals rather than reading dosing recommendations from a blog post.

I listed twenty-five things. That was the format of 2013 blog writing, and lists still have their uses. But for a topic as layered as happiness, the list format can flatten what is actually a deeply nuanced subject. The list suggests that happiness is the sum of these twenty-five practices done consistently. It is not. Happiness is more relational, more physiological, more contextual, and sometimes simpler than a list of practices can capture.

What the field has learned since 2013

Sonja Lyubomirsky, who is one of the most influential happiness researchers working today and a Distinguished Professor at UC Riverside, has spent the past decade refining what she calls the architecture of sustainable happiness. Her work shows that happiness interventions do produce real change when sustained over time — but the change is more durable when the interventions are matched to the person doing them. Gratitude practices work better for some people than for others. Acts of kindness produce more benefit when they are varied rather than routinized. The how matters as much as the what.

Most recently, Lyubomirsky has published a book called How to Feel Loved, co-authored with Harry Reis of the University of Rochester. The book, released in early 2026, makes a striking argument grounded in decades of research. The single most reliable difference between happy and unhappy people is not money, success, or even health. It is whether they feel loved — felt loved, in their bodies, in ordinary moments, by the people closest to them. “To feel that the people in your life truly get you, value you, and love you,” Lyubomirsky and Reis write, “is what makes life worth living.”

This finding has changed how I think about happiness. It also resonates with the trauma and attachment work I do daily in my practice. The people who struggle most with happiness are very often people who, for reasons rooted in their earliest relationships, do not feel loved at a felt-sense level — regardless of how much love is actually present in their current lives. Their nervous systems were calibrated by early conditions to filter out the love that is being offered. The work of becoming happier, for these clients, is not a matter of adopting more positive practices. It is the work of slowly developing the capacity to feel love when it arrives.

Barbara Fredrickson, at the University of North Carolina, has shown through decades of research that positive emotions, even brief ones, produce measurable changes in cognition, social behavior, health, and resilience. Her broaden-and-build theory describes how moments of positive affect open the mind and build durable resources over time. More recent work from her Positive Emotions and Psychophysiology Lab has focused on what she calls positivity resonance — the felt sense of shared positive emotion between two people in conversation, in eye contact, in the simple moments of being together. These small shared moments are not decorative. They are the building blocks of the longer-term well-being that all the other practices try to produce.

What I would tell my 2013 self

Keep the small practices. They matter. Add to them the recognition that happiness is not primarily a matter of individual optimization but of relationship — to your own body, to the people in your life, to whatever you understand as larger than yourself.

Stop treating happiness as a target. Treat it as a byproduct of a life lived in close connection to the things and people that genuinely matter to you. The targeting itself, paradoxically, often gets in the way. People who aim directly at happiness frequently miss it. People who orient their lives toward meaningful work, close relationships, and genuine presence often find happiness arriving, more or less on its own, in the spaces those orientations create.

Be honest about what is not yours to fix. The chronic depression rooted in unprocessed trauma. The anxiety that has somatic components requiring medical care. The deep loneliness that small practices alone cannot reach. These conditions deserve respect, not optimization advice. The right response is often professional support — therapy, medical care, sometimes medication — rather than another daily practice.

And know that the small practices are still worth doing. The gratitude. The breath. The walk in the morning. The person you love. The work that means something to you. The thirteen years that have passed since the original post have only confirmed how much the small things matter — and how much they need to be set within the larger context of relationships, conditions, and the genuine work of becoming oneself.

Where to begin today

If you are reading this and looking for one practice to begin, here is what I would suggest. Once today, pause and notice one small thing you genuinely appreciate about someone in your life.

Not a polite thought. An actual felt sense of appreciation. Then, sometime today, tell them.

Briefly. Specifically. Without needing them to respond in any particular way.

This single practice, repeated regularly over months, produces more measurable change in wellbeing than almost any other single intervention I know. It builds the very thing that

Lyubomirsky and Reis identify as central — the felt sense of being loved, which arrives when we extend love in ways the other person can receive. Each act of specific appreciation is a small revision of the relational climate of your life. The climate, over time, is what we call happiness.

That is what I have come to understand. Happiness is not a mood. It is a relationship. With yourself. With others. With the conditions of your life. The work of building it is real, and the work is slower and more relational than the lists suggested. And it is genuinely worth doing.

Further reading: Sonja Lyubomirsky’s research is available at sonjalyubomirsky.com. Barbara Fredrickson’s Positive Emotions and Psychophysiology Lab at UNC is at peplab.web.unc.edu. For the clinical perspective on how nervous system regulation underlies the capacity to experience happiness, see my companion piece on thecourageousself.com.

April Wright, MA, LMFT is a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist in California and Florida. She blogs about attachment, healing, and the courageous arts of becoming oneself at courageous-arts.com and sees clients at thecourageousself.com.

 

The Art of the Narrative: How to Journal for Personal Growth

Is your journal a place of growth or a loop of stress? Discover the creative science of "narrative construction" and learn how to write your way to a clearer perspective

Is your journal a place of growth or a loop of stress? Discover the creative science of “narrative construction” and learn how to write your way to a clearer perspective

Journaling: The Art of Rewriting Your Story

Journaling is journaling, right? Actually, come to find out, the way you use your pen can either bring relief or keep you stuck in a loop of distress. It all depends on your focus.

The “Healthy” Narrative When you write about a particular event, focusing on cognitive processing helps you resolve the experience and find positive outcomes. Research on bereavement (Purcell, 2006) shows that people who externalize their thoughts and engage in “deliberate, effortful thinking” are more likely to find greater meaning in their relationships and values.

Modern research (Tartakovsky, 2022) calls this “cognitive defusion”—the ability to look at your thoughts rather than being in them. This creative distance allows you to:

  • Clarify what makes you happy.

  • Solve problems more effectively.

  • Increase your awareness of your deepest wants and desires.

Avoiding the Rumination Trap An ineffective way to journal is to focus only on the “raw” emotion. While “venting” feels good in the moment, centering solely on the emotional trauma without searching for a lesson or a new perspective can actually hinder your well-being (Nauert, 2012). We naturally tend to focus on the negative; without a structured representation of the event, we can’t find the “gain” in the pain.

The Creative Advantage Writing helps organize the “mental clutter.” By turning stressful images into a simplified, linguistic form, you restore your sense of mastery over your own life story.

Journaling is journaling, right? Well come to find out, it can either bring relief or intensify misery. It all depends on the focus of writing.

What is the best way to journal?

When writing about a particular event, focusing on cognitive processing (making sense of a stressful event) and emotional expression helps to resolve the experience and find positive outcomes. Research shows writing about a stressful incident with emphasis on thoughts and feelings increases positive growth. It directly affects beliefs about the self, the world, and the future (Ullrich & Lutgendorf, 2002).

A study regarding bereavement supports that persons who engaged in deliberate, effortful thinking about the death and externalized their thoughts on paper were more likely to find greater meaning in their relationship with their lost loved one.  They came attuned to more values, priorities, and perspectives in response to the death (Purcell 2006).

Writing not only has mental improvements but also physical.  Here is a list of just some of the positives of journaling:

  •   Strengthens immune system
  •   Increases white blood cells
  •   Decreases symptoms of asthma and rheumatoid arthritis
  •   Reduces stress
  •   Effectively solve problems
  •   Resolve Conflict
  •   Clarify what makes you happy
  •   Helps to resolve stressful experiences and find positive outcomes
  •   Increases positive growth
  •   Increases ability to find multiple solutions to a single problem
  •   Helps broaden perspective and enables resolution to disagreement
  •   Provides clarity about situations and people
  •   Increases awareness and organization of wants and desires

What is an ineffective way to journal?

The negative consequences to writing persist when focusing solely on emotional expression. Centering on emotional aspects of traumas or stressful situations may not produce greater understanding. One study explains that expressive writing can actually hinder emotional well-being without any relief from distress. We naturally tend to focus on negative emotions and in doing so further deepen despair about the event without concluding anything positive from the experience.  As daunting as some experiences are, there is usually something that can be learned or gained.  It may be hard to find and may not reveal itself immediately but over time may turn into the best thing.  Change usually doesn’t happen until the pain persists and becomes unbearable ( Nauert 2012).

When expressing just your emotions on paper, the negative consequences can effect your physical and mental health.   The following list describes just a few negative costs:

  •   Increases physical illness
  •   No relief from distress
  •   Lowers immune system
  •   Decreases emotional well-being

Thus when writing about a stressful experience hone in on your emotional outlook and cognitive reasoning. Writing about events and reactions to the situation can help to restore self-efficacy, mastery, and add meaning to the incident. Eventually traumatic or stressful images and emotions are translated into organized, coherent, and simplified linguistic forms. Structured representation of the occurrence can be assimilated with other schemas and subsequently can reduce suffering related to the event.

Your life is a story—are you the narrator or just a character? Explore more tools for creative living and self-expression at courageous-arts.com. If you’re looking for deeper support to navigate life’s transitions, visit thecourageouself.com to explore my psychotherapy services.

References

Nauert PhD, R. (2012). Journaling May Worsen Pain of Failed Relationship. Psych Central. http://psychcentral.com/news/2012/11/30/journaling-may-worsen-pain-of-failed-relationship/48379.html

Purcell, M. (2006). The Health Benefits of Journaling. Psych Central. http://psychcentral.com/lib/2006/the-health-benefits-of-journaling/

Ullrich, P. & Lutgendorf, S. (2002).  Journaling About Stressful Events:  Effects of Cognitive Processing and Emotional Expression.  Annals of Behavioral Medicine.  Volume 24, Number 3. University of Iowa.